AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Accepted with minor revisions3/9/2023 ![]() You have the opportunity to respond to any concerns raised by the reviewers through written comments from you to the editor. If they feel that the paper is acceptable, then it will be sent to you for revision. They will read only your abstract or introduction, looking for information such as methodological assumptions, relevance of the study question, appropriate analysis techniques, and interpretation of results. They will not know which experiments you performed or what your findings were. Peer review is done by experts who are not involved in your research project. Rather, peer review seeks to identify errors and flaws in reasoning, so manuscripts that lack important details or evidence for their conclusions will not be published. A manuscript may be accepted for publication even if other scientists find significant problems with its methodology or results. When submitting an article to a journal, the verdict is generally "accept," "accept with minor alterations," "accept with substantial revisions," "reject," or "resubmit as new." The first thing to know about peer review is that it is not a judgment on the quality of your work. ![]() What’s the decision for submitting a paper to a journal? Such papers are typically too important for the journal to take on more work after initial submission. Additionally, these revisions may require additional work by other scientists in the field, so the number of people who might be contacted by an editor to review your paper has been increased.įinally, authors should understand that if they submit a major revision request then this will almost certainly be rejected by the journal. Major revisions can take months or even years to complete depending on how complex the paper is. The main advantage of using the term "major revision" instead of "revision" or "revise" alone is that it makes it clear that authors should not expect a fast turnaround time for their paper after submitting it. However, it is possible that some journals may be willing to let authors make certain changes themselves without requesting a major revision. Usually this means that the authors will have to resubmit the manuscript rather than simply making small changes themselves. In my field (chemistry), the practice is as follows: for journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, "major revision" means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, whereas "minor revision" means that while changes should be made, no major changes should be made.įor journals that do not make such a distinction, authors should understand that their papers will be returned to them for major revisions if appropriate. You should also thank them for their time and effort! If your work is accepted in its current state, contact the editor who made specific comments on your paper and express your willingness to make any necessary changes. Usually, they will let you know how much time you have left before the publication date so that you can plan your work schedule accordingly. ![]() In these cases, write back and tell them what you can do and when you can finish doing it. For example, they may ask you to expand on a particular point or give more background information. Sometimes editors and reviewers request additional experiments or changes to the text for clarity purposes. If they do not reply to your revision requests, it may be because they found no problems with the article. In this case, you should consider their suggestions and send back your revised document. Sometimes the editor or reviewers suggest changes that would improve the manuscript. If your work obtains the verdict "accept with minor revisions," there is a good probability it will be accepted if you answer the criticisms thoroughly. What happens if your paper is accepted with minor modifications?
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |